350-401 · Question #428
Which of the following statements regarding BFD are correct? (Select 2 choices.)
The correct answer is A. BFD is supported by OSPF, EIGRP, BGP, and IS-IS. B. BFD detects link failures in less than one second.. BFD is a protocol-independent mechanism that provides rapid failure detection for forwarding paths and integrates with various routing protocols.
Question
Options
- ABFD is supported by OSPF, EIGRP, BGP, and IS-IS.
- BBFD detects link failures in less than one second.
- CBFD can bypass a failed peer without relying on a routing protocol.
- DBFD creates one session per routing protocol per interface.
- EBFD is supported only on physical interfaces.
- FBFD consumes more CPU resources than routing protocol timers do.
How the community answered
(52 responses)- A92% (48)
- C2% (1)
- E4% (2)
- F2% (1)
Why each option
BFD is a protocol-independent mechanism that provides rapid failure detection for forwarding paths and integrates with various routing protocols.
BFD is designed to be protocol-independent and integrates with all major IP routing protocols, including Interior Gateway Protocols (IGPs) like OSPF, EIGRP, IS-IS, and Exterior Gateway Protocols (EGPs) like BGP, to provide faster failure detection.
A primary benefit and design goal of BFD is its ability to detect failures in the forwarding path significantly faster than traditional routing protocol hello timers, often achieving detection times in milliseconds (less than one second).
BFD's role is solely to detect forwarding path failures and notify the client routing protocol of the status change; it does not perform routing or rerouting actions independently to 'bypass a failed peer'.
BFD typically establishes a single session per forwarding path (or per neighbor) to monitor connectivity; this single BFD session can then be leveraged by multiple routing protocols operating over that same path, rather than creating a separate session for each protocol.
BFD is not limited to physical interfaces; it can be deployed over various interface types, including logical interfaces such such as subinterfaces, EtherChannels/Bundle-Ethernet interfaces, and some tunnel interfaces.
BFD consumes more CPU resources than typical routing protocol timers due to its frequent, sub-second packet exchanges for fast detection; this resource usage is a trade-off for its high-speed convergence capabilities.
Concept tested: BFD features and integration
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/iproute_bfd/configuration/xe-16/ird-bfd-xe-16-book/ird-bfd-oview.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.