350-401 · Question #99
Which two statements about IP SLA are true? (Choose two)
The correct answer is B. It uses active traffic monitoring C. It is Layer 2 transport-independent. IP SLA Explained IP SLA (Internet Protocol Service Level Agreement) actively generates and sends test traffic (such as ICMP echo, UDP jitter, or HTTP requests) to measure network performance - this confirms Option B is correct. It is also Layer 2 transport-independent (Option C),
Question
Which two statements about IP SLA are true? (Choose two)
Options
- ASNMP access is not supported
- BIt uses active traffic monitoring
- CIt is Layer 2 transport-independent
- DThe IP SLA responder is a component in the source Cisco device
- EIt can measure MOS
- FIt uses NetFlow for passive traffic monitoring
How the community answered
(59 responses)- A2% (1)
- B90% (53)
- D5% (3)
- E3% (2)
Explanation
IP SLA Explained
IP SLA (Internet Protocol Service Level Agreement) actively generates and sends test traffic (such as ICMP echo, UDP jitter, or HTTP requests) to measure network performance - this confirms Option B is correct. It is also Layer 2 transport-independent (Option C), meaning it operates at Layer 3 and above, functioning across any underlying transport technology (Ethernet, Frame Relay, MPLS, etc.).
Why the distractors are wrong:
- A – SNMP is supported; IP SLA integrates with SNMP for threshold alerts and traps
- D – The IP SLA responder is a component on the destination (target) device, not the source
- E – IP SLA can measure jitter, latency, and packet loss, but MOS (Mean Opinion Score) is not a native IP SLA metric
- F – IP SLA does not use NetFlow; NetFlow is a separate passive monitoring technology that analyzes existing traffic flows
Memory Tip: Think of IP SLA as a "network health inspector" - it actively sends its own test packets (like a doctor running tests) and works regardless of what's underneath (Layer 2 transport-independent). If you remember "active + Layer 3+," you'll nail B and C every time.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.