An engineer wants to learn more about Cisco ISE and deployed a new lab with two nodes. Which two persona configurations allow the engineer to successfully test redundancy of a failed node? (Choose…

"Health Check node" is not a standard Cisco ISE persona or configuration for redundancy.

Configuring both nodes with only PAN and MnT personas would provide redundancy for administration and monitoring but would lack any PSN functionality to handle actual authentication requests.

Configuring one node as primary PAN and MnT and the other as secondary PAN and MnT creates redundancy for administrative and monitoring services. This ensures that if the primary node fails, the secondary can take over administrative functions and session logging.

Configuring both nodes with PAN, MnT, and PSN personas simultaneously (all three on both) does not explicitly define the primary/secondary roles necessary for testing specific redundancy scenarios like failover, especially for PAN, and is not an optimal small deployment configuration.

Configuring one node as primary PSN and the other as secondary PSN provides redundancy for the authentication, authorization, and accounting services. This is crucial for maintaining network access services if one PSN node becomes unavailable, distributing the load and ensuring high availability for authentication requests.