300-515 · Question #35
Which tool identifies the point of failure in a P2MP LSP from the ingress LSR?
The correct answer is C. P2MP traceroute. P2MP traceroute is specifically designed to trace the path of a Point-to-Multipoint Label Switched Path hop-by-hop from the ingress LSR, using MPLS echo request packets that reveal exactly where the forwarding breaks down across the multipoint tree. P2MP ping (D) only confirms…
Question
Which tool identifies the point of failure in a P2MP LSP from the ingress LSR?
Options
- AJitter TLV
- BSPAN
- CP2MP traceroute
- DP2MP ping
How the community answered
(48 responses)- A6% (3)
- B2% (1)
- C90% (43)
- D2% (1)
Explanation
P2MP traceroute is specifically designed to trace the path of a Point-to-Multipoint Label Switched Path hop-by-hop from the ingress LSR, using MPLS echo request packets that reveal exactly where the forwarding breaks down across the multipoint tree. P2MP ping (D) only confirms whether end-to-end connectivity exists or not - it tells you that something is broken but not where, making it useful for detection but not localization. Jitter TLV (A) is a Type-Length-Value field used in OAM packets to measure delay variation, which is a performance metric unrelated to failure localization. SPAN (B) is a port mirroring feature on switches used to copy traffic for analysis, and has no role in MPLS LSP diagnostics.
Memory tip: Think of it this way - ping = "is it alive?" (yes/no), traceroute = "where did it die?" (hop-by-hop). The same logic applies to their P2MP counterparts; when you need to locate the failure point, always reach for the traceroute variant.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.