nerdexam
Cisco

300-420 · Question #364

A customer is undergoing a WAN re-architecture and wants to design QoS policies for remote sites that have low bandwidth. What must be considered to have CBWFQ configured in the parent and child…

The correct answer is A. Traffic policing is required in the child policy. For an end-to-end QoS design on low-bandwidth WAN links using nested CBWFQ in parent and child policies, traffic policing must be used in the child policy.

WAN for Enterprise Networks

Question

A customer is undergoing a WAN re-architecture and wants to design QoS policies for remote sites that have low bandwidth. What must be considered to have CBWFQ configured in the parent and child policies in an end-to-end QoS design?

Options

  • ATraffic policing is required in the child policy.
  • BCBWFQ is only supported in the child policy.
  • CCBWFQ is only supported in the parent policy.
  • DTraffic shaping is required in the parent policy.

How the community answered

(63 responses)
  • A
    73% (46)
  • B
    8% (5)
  • C
    5% (3)
  • D
    14% (9)

Why each option

For an end-to-end QoS design on low-bandwidth WAN links using nested CBWFQ in parent and child policies, traffic policing must be used in the child policy.

ATraffic policing is required in the child policy.Correct

When implementing a hierarchical QoS policy with CBWFQ (Class-Based Weighted Fair Queuing) at both parent and child levels, traffic policing is often required in the child policy to prevent traffic from exceeding its allocated bandwidth within the child policy and potentially starving other classes within the parent policy. Without policing, oversubscribed child classes could consume more than their fair share when aggregated.

BCBWFQ is only supported in the child policy.

CBWFQ can be supported in both parent and child policies when designing hierarchical QoS, given proper configuration considerations.

CCBWFQ is only supported in the parent policy.

CBWFQ can be supported in both parent and child policies; it is not limited to only the parent.

DTraffic shaping is required in the parent policy.

While traffic shaping is typically configured on the parent policy to control the aggregate outbound traffic rate on an interface, it is not a requirement for having CBWFQ in both parent and child policies in the same way policing helps manage oversubscription within the hierarchy.

Concept tested: Hierarchical QoS, CBWFQ, policing

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/qos_hrqs/configuration/xe-16/qos-hrqs-xe-16-book/qos-hrqs-xe-16-book_chapter_01.html

Topics

#QoS#Hierarchical QoS#CBWFQ#Traffic Policing

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 300-420 Practice