300-420 · Question #355
A company wants to switch from static routing to a dynamic routing protocol to ease the administrative and operational overhead. The network topology is hub and spoke, and the branches use DMVPN…
The correct answer is B. EIGRP with branch routers as stub routers and variance enabled. For a multivendor hub-and-spoke DMVPN topology with limited branch resources and dual internet connections, EIGRP with stub routers and variance enabled is the optimal routing solution.
Question
A company wants to switch from static routing to a dynamic routing protocol to ease the administrative and operational overhead. The network topology is hub and spoke, and the branches use DMVPN back to the hub with two 10-Mbps internet connections. The branch routers are multivendor and have limited memory and CPU resources. Which routing protocol and design solution meets the requirements?
Options
- AeBGP with the hub routers set up as route reflectors
- BEIGRP with branch routers as stub routers and variance enabled
- CISIS with the hub and spoke routers configured in two different areas
- DOSPF with the hub in area 0 and branch routers in stub areas with ECMP
How the community answered
(63 responses)- A6% (4)
- B60% (38)
- C21% (13)
- D13% (8)
Why each option
For a multivendor hub-and-spoke DMVPN topology with limited branch resources and dual internet connections, EIGRP with stub routers and variance enabled is the optimal routing solution.
eBGP can be overly complex for internal network routing in a hub-and-spoke setup and might consume more resources at branch routers than EIGRP stub.
EIGRP is highly suitable for DMVPN hub-and-spoke networks due to its fast convergence and ease of configuration. Configuring branch routers as stub routers limits their routing table size and processing overhead, satisfying the limited resources requirement. Enabling variance allows for efficient unequal cost load balancing across the two 10-Mbps internet connections, maximizing bandwidth utilization and providing flexible path selection. EIGRP is also now an open standard, ensuring multivendor compatibility.
ISIS is a robust routing protocol but EIGRP with stub and variance offers more specific features tailored to the DMVPN hub-and-spoke design with unequal cost path requirements.
OSPF with stub areas would limit routing tables, but OSPF primarily supports Equal Cost MultiPath (ECMP), which is less effective for load balancing across potentially unequal 10-Mbps internet connections than EIGRP's variance feature.
Concept tested: EIGRP design for DMVPN
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/iproute_eigrp/configuration/xe-3s/ire-xe-3s-book/ire-dmvpn-eigrp.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.