210-250 · Question #14
Which security principle states that more than one person is required to perform a critical task?
The correct answer is B. separation of duties. Separation of duties is the security principle that requires more than one person to complete a critical or sensitive task, preventing any single individual from having end-to-end control. This limits fraud, error, and insider threat risk.
Question
Which security principle states that more than one person is required to perform a critical task?
Options
- Adue diligence
- Bseparation of duties
- Cneed to know
- Dleast privilege
How the community answered
(37 responses)- A5% (2)
- B89% (33)
- C3% (1)
- D3% (1)
Why each option
Separation of duties is the security principle that requires more than one person to complete a critical or sensitive task, preventing any single individual from having end-to-end control. This limits fraud, error, and insider threat risk.
Due diligence refers to the ongoing practice of applying reasonable care and thoroughness to security responsibilities, not to requiring multiple approvers for tasks.
Separation of duties mandates that no single individual can control all phases of a sensitive operation - for example, one person initiates a financial transaction while another approves it. This control is designed to detect and deter collusion, accidental errors, and malicious insider activity by requiring collaboration or oversight. It is a core principle in both access control frameworks and compliance standards such as SOX and PCI-DSS.
Need to know is an access control principle limiting information access to those who require it for their role, unrelated to requiring multiple participants for a task.
Least privilege restricts user permissions to the minimum necessary to perform their job function, but does not mandate multi-person involvement in task execution.
Concept tested: Separation of duties multi-person control principle
Source: https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary/term/separation_of_duty
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.