200-301 · Question #1167
What is a function of spine-and-leaf architecture?
The correct answer is A. offers predictable latency of the traffic path between end devices. The spine-and-leaf architecture is designed to provide predictable and consistent latency for traffic paths between any two end devices within the network.
Question
What is a function of spine-and-leaf architecture?
Options
- Aoffers predictable latency of the traffic path between end devices
- Bmitigates oversubscription by adding a layer of leaf switches
- Cexclusively sends multicast traffic between servers that are directly connected to the spine
- Dlimits payload size of traffic within the leaf layer
How the community answered
(40 responses)- A88% (35)
- B3% (1)
- C8% (3)
- D3% (1)
Why each option
The spine-and-leaf architecture is designed to provide predictable and consistent latency for traffic paths between any two end devices within the network.
In a spine-and-leaf architecture, every leaf switch is connected to every spine switch, creating a maximum of two hops between any two leaf switches, which ensures predictable and low-latency traffic delivery between end devices.
While spine-and-leaf *can* mitigate oversubscription through proper design and bandwidth planning, simply 'adding a layer of leaf switches' does not inherently mitigate it; it's the specific interconnections and capacity planning that achieve this.
Spine-and-leaf architecture is a general-purpose network fabric designed for all types of traffic, not exclusively for multicast traffic, and servers are typically connected to leaf switches, not spines.
Spine-and-leaf architecture does not inherently limit the payload size of traffic within the leaf layer; payload size is typically determined by the MTU settings configured on interfaces and devices.
Concept tested: Spine-and-leaf network architecture benefits/functions
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/nexus-9000-series-switches/white-paper-c11-728178.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.