What are three reasons that switches supersede bridges? (Choose three.)

This is incorrect on two counts - switches have larger frame buffers than bridges, not smaller, and smaller buffers would increase latency by causing more drops, not decrease it.

Switches perform the same Layer 2 logic as bridges - forwarding known unicast frames, filtering frames whose source and destination are on the same port, and flooding unknown or broadcast frames - but do so in hardware at much higher speeds.

Each switch port is its own collision domain and can operate in full-duplex, enabling multiple pairs of ports to exchange frames simultaneously, whereas a bridge with few ports serializes traffic across segments.

Switches do not use a larger software inspection engine; instead they use ASICs (Application-Specific Integrated Circuits) for hardware-based wire-speed switching, which is the actual reason for higher throughput.

Switches are manufactured with many ports (24, 48, or more), allowing large numbers of devices to connect directly, while bridges typically had only 2 to 4 ports.