1Y0-401 · Question #60
Scenario: CGE acquires a small energy company that is running MGMT, a proprietary 16-bit application. A Citrix Architect is tasked with deploying this application to the Executives/Management…
The correct answer is B. As a VM hosted app on Windows 7 x86 deployed with Provisioning Services. Deploying a proprietary 16-bit application as an On-Demand App necessitates a 32-bit client operating system for optimal compatibility, combined with a provisioning solution that supports single-image management and swift rollback.
Question
Options
- AAs a VM hosted app on Windows 7 x86 deployed with Machine Creation Services
- BAs a VM hosted app on Windows 7 x86 deployed with Provisioning Services
- CAs a published application on Windows Server 2008 R2 deployed with Machine Creation Services
- DAs a published application on Windows Server 2012 R2 deployed with Provisioning Services
How the community answered
(26 responses)- A27% (7)
- B58% (15)
- C12% (3)
- D4% (1)
Why each option
Deploying a proprietary 16-bit application as an On-Demand App necessitates a 32-bit client operating system for optimal compatibility, combined with a provisioning solution that supports single-image management and swift rollback.
Machine Creation Services (MCS) does not provide the same granular and instant rollback capabilities via vDisk versioning as Provisioning Services (PVS), which is a key requirement for managing instability.
A VM hosted app on Windows 7 x86 (32-bit) provides superior compatibility for legacy 16-bit applications due to its native support for the NTVDM subsystem, which is crucial for the proprietary MGMT application. Provisioning Services (PVS) ensures efficient single-image management, simplified updates, and a fast rollback mechanism through vDisk versioning, meeting the requirements for minimal management and rapid recovery from potential instability.
Windows Server 2008 R2 (likely 64-bit) may present compatibility challenges for a 16-bit application compared to a 32-bit client OS like Windows 7 x86, and MCS lacks the desired rollback features of PVS.
Windows Server 2012 R2 (likely 64-bit) has reduced native support for 16-bit applications compared to a 32-bit client OS, making it less suitable for critical compatibility, despite PVS offering good image management.
Concept tested: 16-bit app compatibility with OS and PVS
Source: https://docs.citrix.com/en-us/citrix-virtual-apps-desktops/virtual-apps-desktops.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.