nerdexam
Citrix

1Y0-401 · Question #344

Why is configuring regional shared storage locations on a CIFS server using Distributed File Services the best design choice for vDisk storage?

The correct answer is A. It is the least expensive solution. This question asks why Distributed File Services (DFS) is the most cost-effective solution for vDisk storage when configuring regional shared storage locations on a CIFS server.

Design XenDesktop Resource Layer

Question

Why is configuring regional shared storage locations on a CIFS server using Distributed File Services the best design choice for vDisk storage?

Options

  • AIt is the least expensive solution.
  • BIt is a highly scalable and resilient solution.
  • CIt creates the least amount of administrative overhead.
  • DIt reduces the system footprint.

How the community answered

(32 responses)
  • A
    78% (25)
  • B
    3% (1)
  • C
    13% (4)
  • D
    6% (2)

Why each option

This question asks why Distributed File Services (DFS) is the most cost-effective solution for vDisk storage when configuring regional shared storage locations on a CIFS server.

AIt is the least expensive solution.Correct

DFS allows administrators to group shared folders located on different servers into one or more logically structured namespaces, providing a single access point to distributed data. This design can leverage existing CIFS servers and storage, avoiding the need for expensive dedicated clustered solutions or complex load balancers, thus making it a cost-effective solution for distributing vDisk storage.

BIt is a highly scalable and resilient solution.

While DFS can provide some resilience through replication, its primary benefit for scalability and resilience is in providing a single namespace, not necessarily in being inherently a highly scalable and resilient storage solution itself like a clustered file system.

CIt creates the least amount of administrative overhead.

DFS requires initial setup and ongoing management of namespaces, replication, and target servers, which adds to administrative overhead compared to a single shared folder.

DIt reduces the system footprint.

DFS is a software layer over existing file servers and storage, which does not directly reduce the system footprint; it actually adds a component to the infrastructure.

Concept tested: DFS-N and DFS-R cost-effectiveness for distributed storage

Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/dfs-namespaces/dfs-overview

Topics

#vDisk storage#CIFS#Distributed File Services#cost-effectiveness#shared storage

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 1Y0-401 Practice