Which statement describes the purpose of the Portfolio Direction Group / Investment Committee?

Question

Options

• AThe role that is responsible for approving changes to the portfolio delivery practices
• BThe governance body where decisions about inclusion of initiatives in the portfolio are made
• CThe governance body responsible for monitoring portfolio progress and resolving issues that may
• DEnsuring that a consistent fit for purpose' approach to benefits management is applied across the

• A
  90% (35)
• B
  3% (1)
• C
  5% (2)
• D
  3% (1)

Explanation

Option A is correct because the Portfolio Direction Group (PDG) / Investment Committee sits at the top of portfolio governance and holds authority over how the portfolio operates - including approving changes to delivery practices, standards, and frameworks that govern execution across the portfolio.

Option B describes a function that is typically handled by this body as part of investment decisions, but framing it as the primary defining purpose conflates investment approval with the broader governance mandate - making it a partial truth that the exam treats as a distractor. Option C describes the Portfolio Progress Group, which handles ongoing monitoring, issue resolution, and performance reporting - a separate governance body focused on running rather than directing the portfolio. Option D describes the remit of a Benefits Management role or function, not an investment/direction committee.

Memory tip: Think of the PDG/Investment Committee as the "rule-setter at the top" - it approves how the game is played (delivery practices), while other bodies play the game. The word "Direction" in its name signals strategic governance and standards approval, not day-to-day monitoring or individual benefit tracking.

No community discussion yet for this question.