SY0-501 · Question #527
A company stores highly sensitive data files used by the accounting system on a server file share. The accounting system uses a service account named accounting-svc to access the file share. The…
The correct answer is A. Exploitation of local console access and removal of data. Despite full disk encryption and restrictive file/share permissions, the data remains vulnerable to exploitation through local console access, which can lead to privilege escalation and unauthorized data removal.
Question
A company stores highly sensitive data files used by the accounting system on a server file share. The accounting system uses a service account named accounting-svc to access the file share. The data is protected will a full disk encryption, and the permissions are set as follows:
File system permissions: Users = Read Only Share permission: accounting-svc = Read Only Given the listed protections are in place and unchanged, to which of the following risks is the data still subject?
Options
- AExploitation of local console access and removal of data
- BTheft of physical hard drives and a breach of confidentiality
- CRemote exfiltration of data using domain credentials
- DDisclosure of sensitive data to third parties due to excessive share permissions
How the community answered
(43 responses)- A72% (31)
- B14% (6)
- C9% (4)
- D5% (2)
Why each option
Despite full disk encryption and restrictive file/share permissions, the data remains vulnerable to exploitation through local console access, which can lead to privilege escalation and unauthorized data removal.
Full disk encryption protects data at rest, but once the system is booted and an attacker gains local console access, the disk is decrypted. With local console access, an attacker can often exploit system vulnerabilities to escalate privileges, bypass existing file system permissions, and then remove the sensitive data, compromising its integrity and availability.
Full disk encryption is explicitly stated as being in place, which directly mitigates the risk of data confidentiality breaches if physical hard drives are stolen while the system is powered off.
While remote exfiltration is possible if `accounting-svc` credentials (which have read-only access) are compromised, the question highlights 'removal of data' as a risk, which is an integrity/availability concern, and local console access offers a more direct path to bypass security controls for such an action.
The listed permissions, 'Users = Read Only' for file system and 'accounting-svc = Read Only' for share permissions, are restrictive and do not represent excessive share permissions that would lead to unintended disclosure.
Concept tested: Local system security and privilege escalation risks
Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/compliance/regulatory/auditing/securing-your-windows-server
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.