SY0-301 · Question #551
The security manager received a report that an employee was involved in illegal activity and has saved data to a workstation's hard drive. During the investigation, local law enforcement's criminal…
The correct answer is A. Chain of custody. When physical evidence is seized by law enforcement, the forensic procedure governing its transfer and possession is chain of custody.
Question
The security manager received a report that an employee was involved in illegal activity and has saved data to a workstation's hard drive. During the investigation, local law enforcement's criminal division confiscates the hard drive as evidence. Which of the following forensic procedures is involved?
Options
- AChain of custody
- BSystem image
- CTake hashes
- DOrder of volatility
How the community answered
(30 responses)- A90% (27)
- B7% (2)
- D3% (1)
Why each option
When physical evidence is seized by law enforcement, the forensic procedure governing its transfer and possession is chain of custody.
Chain of custody is the documented process that tracks who has possession of evidence at every point in time, from collection through investigation and trial. When law enforcement confiscates the hard drive, a chain of custody record must be established and maintained to ensure the evidence is legally admissible. This procedure documents the transfer of the drive from the organization to law enforcement.
System image refers to creating a forensic bit-for-bit copy of a drive before analysis, not the act of transferring physical evidence to another party.
Taking hashes is a verification step to confirm data integrity of a forensic image, not a procedure for transferring physical evidence.
Order of volatility defines the sequence in which digital evidence should be collected based on how quickly it disappears, not physical evidence handoff.
Concept tested: Digital forensics chain of custody procedure
Source: https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/forensics/BPsDigitalEvidence.pdf
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.