SK0-003 · Question #437
Which of the following is a reason to implement a local KVM instead of an IP KVM?
The correct answer is D. Local KVMs are more secure. Local KVMs are often chosen over IP KVMs due to their inherent security advantages by eliminating network exposure.
Question
Which of the following is a reason to implement a local KVM instead of an IP KVM?
Options
- ALocal KVM supports all operating systems.
- BLocal KVMs allow multiple user access.
- CHigher number of ports on a local KVM.
- DLocal KVMs are more secure.
How the community answered
(44 responses)- A2% (1)
- B2% (1)
- C7% (3)
- D89% (39)
Why each option
Local KVMs are often chosen over IP KVMs due to their inherent security advantages by eliminating network exposure.
Both local and IP KVMs are generally operating system agnostic as they emulate keyboard, video, and mouse at a hardware level.
IP KVMs are specifically designed to allow multiple users to access and manage servers remotely, whereas local KVMs typically support only one user at the physical console.
The number of ports on a KVM varies by model and design for both local and IP KVMs, and IP KVMs often support cascading or expansion for a very large number of ports.
A local KVM provides direct, physical access to the connected servers, eliminating the network as a potential attack vector. This direct connection inherently offers a higher level of security compared to IP KVMs, which expose management interfaces to the network, making them vulnerable to network-based attacks.
Concept tested: KVM security comparison
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.