SG0-001 · Question #585
Given an array with sixteen 300GB drives, a storage administrator needs to know how much raw usable space can be made available while still maintaining a highly available RAID configuration with two h
The correct answer is C. 3.9TB, RAID 5. The question asks for the maximum usable capacity from 16x 300GB drives, with two hot spares, in a highly available RAID configuration. After allocating two drives for hot spares, 14 drives remain for the RAID array.
Question
Given an array with sixteen 300GB drives, a storage administrator needs to know how much raw usable space can be made available while still maintaining a highly available RAID configuration with two hot spares. Which of the following is the MAXIMUM capacity that can be allocated and at which RAID level?
Options
- A2.1TB, RAID 1
- B3.6TB, RAID 6
- C3.9TB, RAID 5
- D4.8TB, RAID 0
How the community answered
(45 responses)- A9% (4)
- B20% (9)
- C60% (27)
- D11% (5)
Why each option
The question asks for the maximum usable capacity from 16x 300GB drives, with two hot spares, in a highly available RAID configuration. After allocating two drives for hot spares, 14 drives remain for the RAID array.
RAID 1 mirroring with 14 drives would result in 7 mirrored pairs, yielding (14/2) * 300GB = 2.1TB usable space, which is less than RAID 5.
RAID 6 with 14 drives (N-2 parity) would yield (14-2) * 300GB = 12 * 300GB = 3.6TB usable space, which is less than RAID 5.
With 14 drives remaining for the RAID array (16 total - 2 hot spares), RAID 5 uses N-1 drives for data and one for parity. This configuration provides (14-1) * 300GB = 13 * 300GB = 3900GB, or 3.9TB, and is considered highly available.
RAID 0 provides no redundancy and is not considered highly available, failing a key requirement of the question, and even then, 14 drives in RAID 0 would yield 4.2TB, not 4.8TB.
Concept tested: RAID levels, capacity calculation, hot spares
Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/disk-management/understanding-raid
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.