nerdexam
CompTIA

SG0-001 · Question #469

An administrator is troubleshooting an outage in which a core switch in one of the redundant fabrics has failed. The servers connected to one of the storage arrays lost access to their assigned…

The correct answer is C. All controllers of the array are connected to the failed fabric. A storage array lost LUN access after one redundant fabric switch failed, while other arrays remained accessible, indicating a single point of failure specific to the affected array's fabric connectivity.

Storage Implementation

Question

An administrator is troubleshooting an outage in which a core switch in one of the redundant fabrics has failed. The servers connected to one of the storage arrays lost access to their assigned LUNS, while servers with LUNs assigned from other storage arrays continue to have access. Which of the following caused the outage?

Options

  • AThe array controllers were not configured for failover.
  • BThe array has only one controller.
  • CAll controllers of the array are connected to the failed fabric.
  • DServers' redundant HBAs have incompatible firmware.

How the community answered

(29 responses)
  • A
    10% (3)
  • B
    21% (6)
  • C
    62% (18)
  • D
    7% (2)

Why each option

A storage array lost LUN access after one redundant fabric switch failed, while other arrays remained accessible, indicating a single point of failure specific to the affected array's fabric connectivity.

AThe array controllers were not configured for failover.

Even if array controllers were not configured for failover, losing one fabric should not cause total loss of LUNs if the other fabric's connections are still active and available to the active controller.

BThe array has only one controller.

Having only one controller does not inherently mean a total loss of LUNs if that single controller is connected to both redundant fabrics and one fabric fails.

CAll controllers of the array are connected to the failed fabric.Correct

If all controllers of a specific storage array are connected only to the fabric that experienced a switch failure, then that array would lose all connectivity when that fabric fails. This configuration creates a single point of failure, explaining why only that array's LUNs became inaccessible despite the presence of redundant fabrics overall.

DServers' redundant HBAs have incompatible firmware.

Incompatible HBA firmware might cause performance issues or intermittent connectivity, but it is unlikely to cause a complete and sudden loss of LUN access specifically tied to a fabric switch failure for only one array.

Concept tested: Storage array fabric redundancy and multi-pathing

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/mds9000/configuration/interfaces/nx-os/12x/cisco_mds_interfaces_config/n5k_int_fc_san_red_best_practices.html

Topics

#SAN troubleshooting#Redundancy#Fabric failure#High availability

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full SG0-001 Practice