SG0-001 · Question #288
When installing two PCI-X HBAs into a server to create the fastest access to the SAN, which configuration would be used?
The correct answer is D. separate system buses. To maximize performance with multiple PCI-X HBAs, each HBA should be placed on a separate system bus to avoid contention and fully utilize the available bandwidth.
Question
When installing two PCI-X HBAs into a server to create the fastest access to the SAN, which configuration would be used?
Options
- Aserial system architecture
- Bcascaded system buses
- Csingle dual-port HBA
- Dseparate system buses
How the community answered
(54 responses)- A7% (4)
- B15% (8)
- C6% (3)
- D72% (39)
Why each option
To maximize performance with multiple PCI-X HBAs, each HBA should be placed on a separate system bus to avoid contention and fully utilize the available bandwidth.
Serial system architecture isn't a common term for HBA placement in servers; PCI-X is a parallel bus, and serial connections would likely be slower for this context.
Cascading system buses means they share a common root, which would introduce contention and limit the aggregate throughput, hindering performance.
A single dual-port HBA, while providing two ports, typically shares the bandwidth of a single PCI-X slot and bus, which would be slower than two separate HBAs on distinct buses.
Installing multiple PCI-X HBAs on separate system buses ensures that each HBA has its own dedicated bus bandwidth to the CPU and memory. This configuration minimizes contention and allows simultaneous high-speed data transfer from each HBA, providing the fastest aggregate access to the SAN compared to sharing a single bus.
Concept tested: PCI-X HBA performance optimization and bus architecture
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.