nerdexam
MicrosoftMicrosoft

SC-300 · Question #169

SC-300 Question #169: Real Exam Question with Answer & Explanation

Analysis Note The statement text for Guest1 and Guest2 appears to be cut off in your question — only the guest names are shown, not the actual statements. I'll reconstruct the most likely statements based on this classic Azure AD Identity Governance exam scenario and explain th

Submitted by neha2k· Mar 6, 2026Plan and implement identity governance

Question

Hotspot Question You have an Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) tenant named contoso.com that contains a group named. All Company and has the following Identity Governance settings: - Block external users from signing in to this directory: Yes - Remove external user. Yes - Number of days before removing external user from this directory: 30 On March 11, 2.022, you create an access package named Package1 that has the following settings: - Resource rales 1. Name: All Company 2. Type: Group and Team 3. Role: Member - Lifecycle 1. Access package assignment expire: On date 2. Assignment expiration date: April 1, 2022 On March 1, 2022, you assign Package1 to the guest users shown in the following table. On March 2, 2022, you assign the Reports reader role to Guest1. On April 1, 2022, you invite a guest user named Guest3 to contoso.com. On April 4, 2022, you add Guest3 to the All Company group. For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true. Otherwise, select No. NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point. Answer:

Options

  • __typehotspot
  • variantyes_no

Explanation

Analysis Note

The statement text for Guest1 and Guest2 appears to be cut off in your question — only the guest names are shown, not the actual statements. I'll reconstruct the most likely statements based on this classic Azure AD Identity Governance exam scenario and explain the underlying concepts.


Scenario Summary

SettingValue
Block external users on expiryYes
Remove external userYes
Days before removal30
Package1 expiryApril 1, 2022
Guest1 extra assignmentReports Reader role (Mar 2)
Guest2 extra assignmentNone

Key Timeline

  • April 1, 2022: Package1 expires → both Guest1 and Guest2 lose All Company membership and are immediately blocked from sign-in
  • May 1, 2022 (30 days later): Removal logic runs

Most Likely Statements & Answers

Statement 1 — Guest1 is removed from contoso.com on May 1, 2022 → No

Why: Guest1 has a directly-assigned Reports Reader role (assigned March 2, independently of Package1). Azure AD's "remove external user" governance only removes the guest account if they have no remaining resource access after the access package expires. Because Guest1 still holds the Reports Reader role, the system will not auto-delete the account.

Concept: Access package expiry removes package-managed assignments only. Out-of-band direct role assignments are not tracked by Identity Governance and act as a "hold" preventing account deletion.


Statement 2 — Guest2 is removed from contoso.com on May 1, 2022 → Yes

Why: Guest2's only access was through Package1. When it expired on April 1:

  1. All Company membership removed
  2. Account blocked from sign-in immediately
  3. No other assignments exist → 30-day countdown begins
  4. On May 1, account is automatically deleted

Concept: The full guest lifecycle (block → wait → remove) fires cleanly when there are no other resource ties.


Memory Tip

"Direct assignments are a lifeline."
If a guest has any directly assigned role or group membership outside the access package, they survive the 30-day removal. Only guests with zero remaining access get deleted automatically.


If you can share the actual statement text from the question, I can give you a precise Yes/No with exact reasoning for each.

Topics

#Access Packages#Identity Governance#External User Lifecycle#Guest User Management

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full SC-300 PracticeBrowse All SC-300 Questions