Amazon
SAA-C03 · Question #146
A company runs a Microsoft Windows SMB file share on-premises to support an application. The company wants to migrate the application to AWS. The company wants to share storage across multiple…
The correct answer is A. Amazon EFS: Provides a scalable, shared file storage solution with minimal operational D. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server: Best suited for Windows SMB workloads with low. It's ideal for Linux-based workloads. operational overhead.
Submitted by valeria.br· Mar 4, 2026Design Cost-Optimized Architectures
Question
A company runs a Microsoft Windows SMB file share on-premises to support an application. The company wants to migrate the application to AWS. The company wants to share storage across multiple Amazon EC2 instances. Which solutions will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead? (Select TWO.)
Options
- AAmazon EFS: Provides a scalable, shared file storage solution with minimal operational
- BAmazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP: More suited for workloads requiring NetApp-specific
- CAmazon EBS:Requires manual management of file shares, which increases operational
- DAmazon FSx for Windows File Server: Best suited for Windows SMB workloads with low
- EAmazon FSx for OpenZFS: Better for Linux and Unix-based workloads.
How the community answered
(48 responses)- A79% (38)
- B6% (3)
- C10% (5)
- E4% (2)
Explanation
It's ideal for Linux-based workloads. operational overhead.
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.