SAA-C03 · Question #612
A company runs its media rendering application on premises. The company wants to reduce storage costs and has moved all data to Amazon S3. The on-premises rendering application needs low-latency acces
The correct answer is B. Configure an Amazon S3 File Gateway to provide storage for the on-premises application.. To provide an on-premises media rendering application low-latency access to data stored in Amazon S3 in the most cost-effective way while maintaining performance, an Amazon S3 File Gateway should be configured.
Question
A company runs its media rendering application on premises. The company wants to reduce storage costs and has moved all data to Amazon S3. The on-premises rendering application needs low-latency access to storage. The company needs to design a storage solution for the application. The storage solution must maintain the desired application performance. Which storage solution will meet these requirements in the MOST cost-effective way?
Options
- AUse Mountpoint for Amazon S3 to access the data in Amazon S3 for the on-premises application.
- BConfigure an Amazon S3 File Gateway to provide storage for the on-premises application.
- CCopy the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon FSx for Windows File Server. Configure an Amazon
- DConfigure an on-premises file server. Use the Amazon S3 API to connect to S3 storage.
How the community answered
(44 responses)- A11% (5)
- B80% (35)
- C2% (1)
- D7% (3)
Why each option
To provide an on-premises media rendering application low-latency access to data stored in Amazon S3 in the most cost-effective way while maintaining performance, an Amazon S3 File Gateway should be configured.
Mountpoint for Amazon S3 allows direct S3 access from on-premises but does not provide local caching for low-latency access to frequently used data and is subject to network latency over the internet.
An Amazon S3 File Gateway provides an on-premises file interface (NFS or SMB) with local caching, allowing the media rendering application to access data in Amazon S3 with low latency for frequently accessed files while leveraging the cost-effectiveness and scalability of S3 for backend storage.
Copying data from S3 to Amazon FSx for Windows File Server (a cloud service) and accessing it over AWS Direct Connect would increase complexity and costs, negating the cost reduction benefit of S3 as primary storage.
Configuring an on-premises file server adds local storage costs and management overhead, and accessing S3 directly via its API from on-premises would not guarantee low-latency access for all operations without a local caching mechanism.
Concept tested: Hybrid cloud storage, S3 File Gateway, low-latency on-premises access to cloud data
Source: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/storagegateway/latest/userguide/StorageGatewayConcepts.html#FileGatewayConcepts
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.