nerdexam
PMI

PMP · Question #1169

A network transformation project to increase efficiency and return on investment (ROI) is in the implementation stage. A conflict between the head of the network and the transformation manager arises.

The correct answer is B. Analyze the context of the issue.. To manage the conflict between the head of the network and the transformation manager during the implementation stage, the project manager should facilitate open communication, identify root causes, mediate discussions, focus on project goals, seek compromise, escalate if necessa

Submitted by eva_at· Apr 18, 2026People

Question

A network transformation project to increase efficiency and return on investment (ROI) is in the implementation stage. A conflict between the head of the network and the transformation manager arises. What should the project manager do to manage this?

Options

  • ALead the parties to find a compromise.
  • BAnalyze the context of the issue.
  • CEscalate the problem to the project sponsor.
  • DEvaluate the influence of the parties involved.

How the community answered

(29 responses)
  • A
    3% (1)
  • B
    72% (21)
  • C
    17% (5)
  • D
    7% (2)

Explanation

To manage the conflict between the head of the network and the transformation manager during the implementation stage, the project manager should facilitate open communication, identify root causes, mediate discussions, focus on project goals, seek compromise, escalate if necessary, and document agreements.

Topics

#Conflict Management#Stakeholder Management#Problem Solving

Community Discussion

9
Samuel O.Samuel O.Mar 12, 2026

Confirmed B on exam last month. PMI wants you to gather facts and understand the root cause before jumping to a resolution method, which is why analyzing the context comes first. In practice, I have seen too many project managers rush straight to compromise or escalation without understanding what is actually driving the disagreement, and it usually backfires. Once you know the real context, the right path forward, whether that is facilitate, compromise, or escalate, becomes a lot more obvious.

24
Ola B.Ola B.Mar 13, 2026

Agreed on B, and if you want to see this play out, spin up a quick mock conflict scenario in a sandbox project with two stakeholders who have competing resource demands and walk through the context analysis step before touching any resolution technique.

0
Brenda K.Brenda K.Mar 6, 2026

B is the time-saver here, analyze before you act. The PMP logic is always assess context first before jumping to a resolution method like compromise or escalating, but does anyone know if the exam treats this differently when the conflict is already active and blocking implementation?

4
Anjali D.Anjali D.Mar 8, 2026

Agree on B, and to your question the exam still wants you to assess first even when the conflict is blocking work, because jumping straight to a resolution method without analyzing root cause is exactly the trap they build into the wrong options.

0
Fatima Z.Fatima Z.Mar 10, 2026

Locked in B on my exam last week because PMP loves the "analyze first, act second" dance, so remember CAB for conflict: Context before Action, always. When you see a messy fight between big players, your instinct might scream "compromise now" or "escalate fast," but the PMBOK wants you to gather facts before picking a tool. Quick question: does anyone know if the exam ever rewards escalate as a first move, or is that always a trap answer meant to test your patience?

4
Anjali D.Anjali D.Mar 16, 2026

Our group landed on B after going back and forth. The consensus was that the PM needs to understand the root cause and context of the conflict before jumping to a resolution, and a few people noted that A and C sound action-oriented but skip the analyze step the PMBOK emphasizes.

3
Brenda K.Brenda K.Mar 17, 2026

B is right and your group's reasoning is solid, but watch your clock here because the analyze-first angle should be a five-second pick, not a back-and-forth debate; flag it and move on so you bank time for the scenario drag-drops later.

0
Ola B.Ola B.Mar 27, 2026

C all day. Two heavyheads clashing means escalate to the sponsor.

0
Samuel O.Samuel O.Mar 30, 2026

Ola B., I see the logic on escalating but the answer is actually B because when two heavyweights are clashing the playbook is to use the documented decision making framework and conflict resolution process first, not jump straight to the sponsor. Seen this play out on enough enterprise projects to know the exam wants you to work the process before you escalate.

0
Full PMP Practice