PHR · Question #101
On November 13, 2000 CFR Part 60-2 was revised to address affirmative action to make the rules more accessible and easier to implement. Which of the following statements is not part of this…
The correct answer is C. Granted employers with fewer than 100 employees, permission to prepare a job group analysis. The 2000 revision to 41 CFR Part 60-2 simplified affirmative action planning, but the job group analysis exception applies to employers with fewer than 50 employees, not 100. Choice C describes a threshold that does not exist in the actual regulation.
Question
On November 13, 2000 CFR Part 60-2 was revised to address affirmative action to make the rules more accessible and easier to implement. Which of the following statements is not part of this significant update to the Affirmative Action program in CFR Part 60-2?
Options
- AReduced the number of additional required elements of the written Affirmative Action Plan from 10
- BReaffirmed that affirmative action isn't to establish quotes, but to create goals
- CGranted employers with fewer than 100 employees, permission to prepare a job group analysis
- DWorkforce analysis was replaced with a one-page organizational profile
How the community answered
(42 responses)- A5% (2)
- B2% (1)
- C81% (34)
- D12% (5)
Why each option
The 2000 revision to 41 CFR Part 60-2 simplified affirmative action planning, but the job group analysis exception applies to employers with fewer than 50 employees, not 100. Choice C describes a threshold that does not exist in the actual regulation.
Reducing the required additional elements of the written AAP was a genuine part of the 2000 revision, so this statement is true and does not qualify as the answer.
Reaffirming that affirmative action establishes goals rather than quotas was explicitly addressed in the 2000 revision, making this a true statement about the update.
The 2000 revision permitted employers with fewer than 50 employees to prepare a job group analysis using EEO-1 categories - not employers with fewer than 100 employees as stated. Because the 100-employee threshold is factually incorrect, this statement was never part of the update and is therefore the correct answer to the 'not part of' question.
Replacing the workforce analysis with a one-page organizational profile was a real change introduced by the 2000 revision to simplify compliance.
Concept tested: 41 CFR Part 60-2 affirmative action plan requirements
Source: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-41/subtitle-B/chapter-60/part-60-2
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.