OG0-091 · Question #192
Which of the following reasons best describes why the ADM numbering scheme for versioning output is an example and not mandatory?
The correct answer is B. To permit adaptation as required. TOGAF presents the ADM versioning numbering scheme as an illustrative example rather than a strict requirement specifically to permit adaptation as required. Different organizations have varying governance structures, tooling, and version control conventions. By labeling the…
Question
Which of the following reasons best describes why the ADM numbering scheme for versioning output is an example and not mandatory?
Options
- ATo show the evolution of deliverables
- BTo permit adaptation as required
- CTo enable use with the Architecture Content Framework
- DTo support change management
How the community answered
(39 responses)- A3% (1)
- B87% (34)
- C3% (1)
- D8% (3)
Explanation
TOGAF presents the ADM versioning numbering scheme as an illustrative example rather than a strict requirement specifically to permit adaptation as required. Different organizations have varying governance structures, tooling, and version control conventions. By labeling the scheme as an example, TOGAF acknowledges that a one-size-fits-all versioning approach is impractical. Organizations are encouraged to adopt, modify, or replace the scheme to fit their own processes while still achieving the underlying goal of tracking deliverable evolution. The other options describe valid architecture concerns, but none explains why the scheme is deliberately optional.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.