Recently, the vice president Of IT infrastructure was migrated from a physical computer to a virtual desktop. The administrator wants to ensure that this user has the best possible experience and want

Question

Options

• ACreate a new alert policy to alert if the CPU on the virtual desktop is over and configure a
• BCreate a new alert policy to alert if the CPU on the virtual desktop is over and configure a
• CCreate a new alert policy to alert if the CPU on the virtual desktop's host is over 90%.
• DCreate a new alert policy to alert if the CPU on the virtual desktop's cluster is over 90%.

• A
  9% (2)
• B
  83% (19)
• C
  4% (1)
• D
  4% (1)

Explanation

To ensure the best experience for a specific high-priority user, the most targeted and actionable alert is one scoped to that individual virtual desktop VM's CPU utilization. A VM-level alert fires when the desktop itself is CPU-constrained regardless of overall cluster or host headroom. Since the cluster average is only 20%, a cluster-level alert (option D) would almost never fire. A host-level alert (option C) covers all VMs on that host and could fire due to other VMs. Option B - alerting on the CPU of the specific virtual desktop at a defined threshold (e.g., 90%) - gives the administrator precise, early warning that this user's session is degrading, enabling proactive intervention before the VP notices a problem.

No community discussion yet for this question.