JN0-663 Question #53: Real Exam Question with Answer & Explanation

Click the Exhibit button. user@router# run show route 2.0.0.0/8 inet.0: 101 destinations, 198 routes (100 active, 0 holddown, 1 hidden) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both 2.0.0.0/8 *[BGP/170] 00: 12:06, MED 1000, Localpref 100, from 10.220.1.2 As path: 2000 I, validation-state: unverified > to 10.220.15.2 via ge- 1/0/0.0, label-switched-path r1-to-r3 to 10.220.12.2 via ge- 1/1/0.0, label-switched-path r1-to-r3 [BGP/170] 0010, MED 1000, localpref 100, from 10.220.1.5 AS path: 2000 I, validation-state: unverified > to 10.220.15.2 via ge- 1/0/0.0, label-switched-path r1-to-r3 to 10.220.12.2 via ge- 1/1/0.0, label-switched-path r1-to-r3 2.6.6.6/32 *[BGP/170] 00:12:06, MED 1000, localpref 100, from 10.220.1.2 AS path: 2000 I, validation-state: unverified > to 10.220.15.2 via ge- 1/0/0.0, label-switched-path r1-tor3 to 10.220.12.2 via ge- 1/1/0.0, label-switched-path r1-to-r3 [BGP/170] 00:12:10, MED 1000, localpref 100, from 10.220.1.5 AS path: 2000 I, validation-state: unverified > to 10.220.15.2 via ge- 1/0/0.0, label-switched-path r1-to-r3 to 10.220.12.2 via ge- 1/1/0.0, label-switched-path r1-to-r3 user@router# run show route advertising-protocol bgp 192.168.11.0 inet.0: 101 destinations, 198 routes (100 active, 0 holddown, 1 hidden) Prefix Nexthop MED Lclpref AS path * 2.6.6.6/32 Self 2000 I [edit protocols bgp] user@router# show export reject; group peer { export as1000; neighbor 192.168.11.0 { family inet { unicast; } peer-as 1000; } } [edit policy-options] user@router# show policy-statement as1000 { term 1 { from { route-filter 2.0.0.0/8 longer; } then accept; } term 2 { then reject; } } policy-statement reject { term 1 { from { route-filter 2.0.0.0/8 exact; } then reject } } You want to advertise routes 2.0.0.0/8 and 2.6.6.6/32 to BGP peer 192.168.11.0. Referring to the exhibit, which configuration change would satisfy this requirement?