HPE6-A84 · Question #13
Refer to the scenario. A customer has an Aruba ClearPass cluster. The customer has AOS-CX switches that implement 802.1X authentication to ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM). Switches are using local…
The correct answer is C. Remove VLAN assignments from role configurations on the gateways. The UBT solution requires that the VLAN assignments for the wired clients are done by the gateway, not by the switch. Therefore, the role configurations on the gateways should not have any VLAN assignments, as they would override the VLAN 20 that is specified in the enforcement…
Question
Refer to the scenario. A customer has an Aruba ClearPass cluster. The customer has AOS-CX switches that implement 802.1X authentication to ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM). Switches are using local port-access policies. The customer wants to start tunneling wired clients that pass user authentication only to an Aruba gateway cluster. The gateway cluster should assign these clients to the "eth-internet" role. The gateway should also handle assigning clients to their VLAN, which is VLAN 20. The plan for the enforcement policy and profiles is shown below:
The gateway cluster has two gateways with these IP addresses:
- Gateway 1
o VLAN 4085 (system IP) = 10.20.4.21 o VLAN 20 (users) = 10.20.20.1 o VLAN 4094 (WAN) = 198.51.100.14
- Gateway 2
o VLAN 4085 (system IP) = 10.20.4.22 o VLAN 20 (users) = 10.20.20.2 o VLAN 4094 (WAN) = 198.51.100.12
- VRRP on VLAN 20 = 10.20.20.254
The customer requires high availability for the tunnels between the switches and the gateway cluster. If one gateway falls, the other gateway should take over its tunnels. Also, the switch should be able to discover the gateway cluster regardless of whether one of the gateways is in the cluster. What is one change that you should make to the solution?
Options
- AChange the ubt-client-vlan to VLAN 13.
- BConfigure edge ports in VLAN trunk mode.
- CRemove VLAN assignments from role configurations on the gateways.
- DConfigure the UBT solution to use VLAN extend mode.
How the community answered
(31 responses)- A6% (2)
- B10% (3)
- C68% (21)
- D16% (5)
Explanation
The UBT solution requires that the VLAN assignments for the wired clients are done by the gateway, not by the switch. Therefore, the role configurations on the gateways should not have any VLAN assignments, as they would override the VLAN 20 that is specified in the enforcement profile. Instead, the role configurations should only have policies that define the access rights for the clients in the "eth-internet" role. This way, the gateway can assign the clients to VLAN 20 and apply the appropriate policies based on their role.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.