Your ArubaoS solution has detected a rogue AP with Wireless intrusion Prevention (WIP). Which information about the detected radio can best help you to locate the rogue device?

Question

Options

• Athe match method
• Bthe detecting devices
• Cthe match type
• Dthe confidence level

• A
  4% (2)
• B
  87% (48)
• C
  7% (4)
• D
  2% (1)

Explanation

When an ArubaOS solution detects a rogue AP with Wireless Intrusion Prevention (WIP), the most crucial information that can help locate the rogue device is the detecting devices. This is because the detecting devices can provide the physical location or the network topology context where the rogue AP has been detected. The detecting devices are typically the Air Monitors (AMs) or Access Points (APs) in the network that have identified the rogue AP's presence. These devices can provide information such as the signal strength and the direction from which the rogue AP's signals are being received. By triangulating this information from multiple detecting devices, it becomes possible to pinpoint the physical location of the rogue AP. Additionally, the detecting devices can log events and alerts that can be reviewed to understand the rogue AP's behavior, such as the channels it is operating on and the potential impact on the authorized wireless network. This information is vital for network administrators to quickly and effectively respond to the threat posed by the rogue AP. In contrast, the match method (A) and match type ?relate to how the rogue AP is classified and identified by the system, which is useful for classification but not for physical location. The confidence level (D) indicates the system's certainty in the classification but does not aid in locating the device.

No community discussion yet for this question.