nerdexam
HP

HPE6-A47 · Question #64

An architect plans to deploy a Mobility Controller (MC) at one building in subnet 10.23.01.0/24 and another MC in another building in subnet 10.44.12.0/24. The MCs need to provide redundancy for…

The correct answer is B. The MCs cannot be in a cluster, and they must use Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) to provide redundancy for each other. See the full explanation below for the reasoning.

Question

An architect plans to deploy a Mobility Controller (MC) at one building in subnet 10.23.01.0/24 and another MC in another building in subnet 10.44.12.0/24. The MCs need to provide redundancy for each other. What must the architect take into account in the redundancy plan?

Options

  • AThe MCs cannot provide any level of redundancy for each other unless one is moved into the other's subnet.
  • BThe MCs cannot be in a cluster, and they must use Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) to provide redundancy for each other.
  • CThe MCs can be in a cluster, but the cluster will not support features such as stateful failover.
  • DEach MC can be the backup LMS for the other MCs' APs, but it cannot be in a cluster with the other MC.

How the community answered

(26 responses)
  • A
    15% (4)
  • B
    73% (19)
  • C
    8% (2)
  • D
    4% (1)

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full HPE6-A47 Practice