A customer asks what makes Aruba AlOps different from other types of troubleshooting tools. What should you explain?

Question

Options

• AAruba AlOps provides recommendations of the service level expectations for IT to set baselines.
• BAruba AlOps relies on troubleshooting technologies, such as SNMP traps, that IT is probably
• CAruba AlOps not only points out problems, but it also provides actionable recommendations such
• DAruba AlOps identifies if one AP switch port or WAN link is down.

• A
  10% (3)
• B
  3% (1)
• C
  3% (1)
• D
  83% (25)

Explanation

Important note: The answer key appears to contain an error. Based on Aruba AIOps documentation and exam content, C is the correct answer, not D. Here's the full explanation:

Aruba AIOps distinguishes itself by going beyond simply detecting problems - it provides actionable recommendations (such as suggested fixes or configuration changes), which passive monitoring tools do not. This proactive, prescriptive capability is the core differentiator that makes AIOps more than just an alerting system.

• A is wrong because AIOps does not define or recommend what SLAs IT should set - that's a business/policy decision, not an AIOps function.
• B is wrong because AIOps actually moves away from legacy tools like SNMP traps; it uses AI/ML-driven telemetry, not traditional polling methods.
• D is wrong because identifying a single downed AP port or WAN link is basic monitoring - any SNMP-based NMS can do this. This does not describe what makes AIOps different.

Memory tip: Think "AIOps = AI + Ops." The "Ops" part means it takes operational action by recommending fixes, not just raising alarms. If an answer describes something a 2005-era monitoring tool could do, it's not the AIOps differentiator.

Flag this question if you encounter it on a practice exam - the listed answer of D is almost certainly a keying error and could hurt your preparation if taken at face value.

No community discussion yet for this question.