Which statement best describes Ansible integration with HPE OneView?

Question

Options

• AIt enables health monitoring of third party storage systems that normally are not supported in HPE
• BIt enables support for additional servers and HPE Synergy frames if appropriate license is
• CIt allows provisioning physical infrastructure in minutes with a widely used cloud infrastructure
• DIt allows the deployment of HPE Synergy infrastructure through a set of PowerShell scripts using

• A
  2% (1)
• B
  7% (3)
• C
  89% (40)
• D
  2% (1)

Explanation

Ansible integration with HPE OneView delivers infrastructure-as-code capabilities by exposing HPE OneView's REST API through Ansible modules, letting teams define and provision physical infrastructure (servers, storage, networking) declaratively in minutes - exactly what option C describes. Ansible is one of the most widely adopted infrastructure automation tools, making "widely used cloud infrastructure automation" the defining phrase here.

Why the distractors are wrong:

• A is wrong because the integration is not designed to extend health monitoring to unsupported third-party storage - that's an HPE OneView scope/compatibility concern, not an Ansible function.
• B is wrong because adding support for additional servers or Synergy frames is governed by HPE licensing terms, not by Ansible integration.
• D is wrong because it describes PowerShell scripts - that would apply to the HPE OneView PowerShell library, a separate tool entirely. Ansible uses YAML-based playbooks, not PowerShell.

Memory tip: Remember "Ansible = Automation in minutes with YAML" - if you see PowerShell in an Ansible answer choice, eliminate it immediately, since those are two distinct automation ecosystems.

No community discussion yet for this question.