Establishing multiple nodes under a Route-Policy. Different node numbers are identified by node numbers. The relationship between different nodes is an "OR" relationship.

Question

Options

• ATRUE
• BFALSE

• A
  72% (31)
• B
  28% (12)

Explanation

Option A is correct because in a Route-Policy (commonly used in network routing configurations on platforms like Huawei), you can define multiple nodes within a single policy, each identified by a unique node number. These nodes function with an OR logic - when a route is being evaluated, it is tested against each node in ascending order, and if it matches any node's conditions, that node's actions are applied and evaluation stops (match-first behavior). This means satisfying one node is sufficient, which is exactly the "OR" relationship described.

Why B is wrong: "FALSE" would imply the relationship between nodes is something other than OR - for example, AND (requiring all nodes to match). That is incorrect; nodes are alternatives, not cumulative requirements. The AND relationship applies within a single node, where multiple if-match clauses must all be satisfied simultaneously.

Memory tip: Think of Route-Policy nodes like numbered lanes at a toll booth - a vehicle (route) tries lane 1 first, and if it fits, it goes through. If not, it tries lane 2, and so on. Getting through any lane is enough - that's OR logic. The strict multi-condition checking happens inside each lane, not across lanes.

No community discussion yet for this question.