H12-821_V1.0 · Question #1022
Refer to the provided OSPF network diagram with R1, R2, and a Server in Area 0, where R1's GigabitEthernet0/0/1 interface is configured for OSPF in Area 0 and connected to a segment including R2's…
The correct answer is C. The network segment to which GE 0/0/1 of R1 belongs cannot be advertised. Option C is false because any interface actively configured for OSPF in an area will have its directly connected network advertised into the OSPF domain - so the 192.168.4.0/24 segment reachable via GE0/0/1 is fully advertised to OSPF neighbors, making the claim that it "cannot…
Question
Options
- AR2 can access the server.
- BGE 0/0/1 of R1 will send OSPF packets.
- CThe network segment to which GE 0/0/1 of R1 belongs cannot be advertised.
- DGE 0/0/1 of R1 cannot accept OSPF packets.
How the community answered
(26 responses)- A4% (1)
- B4% (1)
- C85% (22)
- D8% (2)
Explanation
Option C is false because any interface actively configured for OSPF in an area will have its directly connected network advertised into the OSPF domain - so the 192.168.4.0/24 segment reachable via GE0/0/1 is fully advertised to OSPF neighbors, making the claim that it "cannot be advertised" incorrect. Option A is a true statement since R2 and the server share the same Area 0 network segment, giving R2 full IP reachability to the server. Option B is true because GE0/0/1 is an active OSPF interface and will transmit OSPF Hello packets to form and maintain neighbor adjacencies. Option D is true in this topology because a specific configuration (such as a passive-interface setting or an inbound filter on GE0/0/1) can prevent the interface from processing incoming OSPF packets, even while the network it belongs to remains advertised.
Memory tip: In OSPF, an interface enabled for OSPF always contributes its connected subnet to the link-state database. Whenever an answer choice says a network "cannot be advertised" for an OSPF-configured interface, that claim is false by definition.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.