H12-323_V2.0 · Question #131
In an office scenario, 300 terminals are connected to the network, and 180 terminals generate service traffic at the same time. When both AP and terminal support Wi-Fi 6, the bandwidth requirement…
The correct answer is A. 4. Calculation: 180 active terminals ÷ 51 terminals per AP = 3.53 APs - since you cannot deploy a fraction of an AP, you must round up to 4, making A correct. Options B (2) and C (3) are wrong because they yield insufficient capacity: 2 APs cover only 102 terminals and 3 APs cover…
Question
In an office scenario, 300 terminals are connected to the network, and 180 terminals generate service traffic at the same time. When both AP and terminal support Wi-Fi 6, the bandwidth requirement of a single terminal is 8Mbps. Under this bandwidth requirement, the tri-band AP (8x8 MINO) deployed can support 51 terminals (2x2 MIMO) concurrently. So for the above scenario, how many tri-band APs are needed to meet the capacity requirements of the WLAN network?
Options
- A4
- B2
- C3
- D1
How the community answered
(41 responses)- A76% (31)
- B7% (3)
- C2% (1)
- D15% (6)
Explanation
Calculation: 180 active terminals ÷ 51 terminals per AP = 3.53 APs - since you cannot deploy a fraction of an AP, you must round up to 4, making A correct. Options B (2) and C (3) are wrong because they yield insufficient capacity: 2 APs cover only 102 terminals and 3 APs cover only 153, both falling short of the 180 simultaneous users. Option D (1) is far too few, handling only 51 of the 180 required sessions. The key figure to use is the simultaneous traffic load (180), not the total terminal count (300) - the 300 total is a distractor representing terminals that could connect, not those actively generating traffic.
Memory tip: "Always divide by the active users, never the total, and always round up - APs come in whole numbers."
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.