FCNSP · Question #8
Examine the Exhibit shown below; then answer the question following it. The Vancouver FortiGate unit initially had the following information in its routing table: S 172.20.0.0/16 [10/0] via 172.21.1.2
The correct answer is B. The 'gateway' IP address is NOT in the same subnet as the IP address of port1.. See the full explanation below for the reasoning.
Question
Examine the Exhibit shown below; then answer the question following it. The Vancouver FortiGate unit initially had the following information in its routing table:
S 172.20.0.0/16 [10/0] via 172.21.1.2, port2 C 172.21.0.0/16 is directly connected, port2 C 172.11.11.0/24 is directly connected, port1 Afterwards, the following static route was added:
config router static edit 6 set dst 172.20.1.0 255.255.255.0 set pririoty 0 set device port1 set gateway 172.11.12.1 next end Since this change, the new static route is NOT showing up in the routing table. Given the information provided, which of the following describes the cause of this problem?
Exhibit
Options
- AThe subnet 172.20.1.0/24 is overlapped with the subnet of one static route that is already in the routing
- BThe 'gateway' IP address is NOT in the same subnet as the IP address of port1.
- CThe priority is 0, which means that the route will remain inactive.
- DThe static route configuration is missing the distance setting.
How the community answered
(42 responses)- A5% (2)
- B83% (35)
- C2% (1)
- D10% (4)
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.