E20-818 · Question #152
A customer has implemented TimeFinder/Exchange Integration Module (TF/EIM) to back up two Microsoft Exchange 2007 servers. A single backup server is handling the backups of both production servers…
The correct answer is A. Cluster allocation unit size was not set correctly. See the full explanation below for the reasoning.
Question
A customer has implemented TimeFinder/Exchange Integration Module (TF/EIM) to back up two Microsoft Exchange 2007 servers. A single backup server is handling the backups of both production servers. After adding a third Exchange server, the customer notices that the "eseutil" check run as part of Exbackup2007 is taking considerably longer to run on the new server than it does on the other two servers, although there is less data to back up. No other performance issues have been noted on the new Exchange server. What is the most likely cause of the backup delays on the new server? EMC E20-818 Exam
Options
- ACluster allocation unit size was not set correctly
- BLUN alignment was not performed on the production database volumes
- CConcatenated metavolumes were used instead of striped
- DLUN alignment was not performed on the BCV volumes
How the community answered
(60 responses)- A85% (51)
- B5% (3)
- C2% (1)
- D8% (5)
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.