CV0-002 · Question #277
A company has an SLA of 15ms for storage latency. Given the above metrics, which of the following is the MOST appropriate change to the environment?
The correct answer is C. Enable compression on the storage side. To address storage latency exceeding a 15ms SLA, the most appropriate change is to enable compression on the storage side.
Question
A company has an SLA of 15ms for storage latency. Given the above metrics, which of the following is the MOST appropriate change to the environment?
Exhibit
Options
- AAdd computing nodes and data nodes on the storage side.
- BAdd more storage shelves to the current array.
- CEnable compression on the storage side.
- DEnable deduplication on the storage side.
How the community answered
(29 responses)- A7% (2)
- B14% (4)
- C55% (16)
- D24% (7)
Why each option
To address storage latency exceeding a 15ms SLA, the most appropriate change is to enable compression on the storage side.
Adding computing and data nodes primarily scales capacity and IOPS for distributed storage, but does not directly guarantee a reduction in latency for individual I/O operations.
Adding more storage shelves increases capacity and potentially IOPS, but does not inherently reduce the latency of individual I/O requests.
Enabling compression reduces the amount of data transferred to and from physical storage, which directly decreases the time required for I/O operations and thus lowers storage latency. The processing overhead of compression is typically less than the latency reduction achieved by moving less data.
While deduplication reduces stored data, its processing overhead, especially during writes, can sometimes increase latency, making it less reliably a primary solution for latency reduction compared to compression.
Concept tested: Storage optimization for latency reduction
Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/data-deduplication/overview
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.
