Can "cost" be regarded as Exit criteria?

Question

Options

• AYes. Spending too much money on test ng will result in an unprofitable product, and having cost
• BNo. The financial value of product quality cannot be estimated, so it is incorrect to use cost as an
• CYes. Going by cost as an exit criterion constrains the testing project which will hello achieve the
• DNo The cost of testing cannot be measured effectively, so it is incorrect to use cost as an exit

• A
  95% (57)
• B
  3% (2)
• D
  2% (1)

Explanation

Cost can be regarded as an exit criterion for testing, because it is a factor that affects the profitability and feasibility of the software product. Testing is an investment that aims to improve the quality and reliability of the software product, but it also consumes resources, such as time, money, and human effort. Therefore, testing should be planned and executed in a way that balances the cost and benefit of testing activities. Having cost as an exit criterion helps to avoid spending too much money on testing, which may result in an unprofitable product or a loss of competitive advantage. Cost can also help to prioritize and focus the testing efforts on the most critical and valuable features and functions of the software product. However, cost should not be the only exit criterion for testing, as it may not reflect the true quality and risk level of the software product. Other exit criteria, such as defect rate, test coverage, user satisfaction, etc., should also be considered and defined in the test plan.

No community discussion yet for this question.