What are the TWO most significant benefits a test execution tool should bring to the organization? 1 credit [K2]

Question

Options

• ALess expensive and time consuming regression testing
• BMore structured incident management
• CImproved control and monitoring
• DVisibility on test coverage
• EMore coverage during regression testing

• A
  88% (36)
• B
  2% (1)
• C
  7% (3)
• D
  2% (1)

Explanation

Test execution tools deliver their greatest organizational value by directly reducing the cost and time of regression testing (A) and expanding regression coverage (E). Regression testing is typically the most repetitive and resource-intensive testing activity - automation slashes the manual effort, and with that freed capacity, teams can run far more test cases than they could by hand, achieving broader coverage without a proportional increase in cost.

Why the distractors fall short:

• B (Incident management): Incident/defect management is typically handled by separate defect-tracking tools (e.g., Jira), not test execution tools directly.
• C (Control and monitoring): While test execution tools can provide some reporting, improved control and monitoring is more closely associated with test management tools, not execution tools specifically.
• D (Test coverage visibility): Coverage metrics are primarily a benefit of coverage analysis tools or test management tools; a test execution tool's primary value is running tests efficiently, not reporting coverage.

Memory tip: Think of the "two Rs" - Reduce cost (regression runs faster/cheaper) and Raise coverage (regression tests more). A test execution tool's core promise is automating repetitive runs, which simultaneously brings costs down and volume up.

No community discussion yet for this question.