CTAL-TAE · Question #10
You have inherited a TAS that is working well. It uses keyword-driven scripting and was well architected. The automation architect who built the system has now moved on to another company. The TAS…
The correct answer is B. The level of abstraction, coupled with the departure of the architect may make the system hard to. The most significant risk is that the level of abstraction, combined with the departure of the original architect, could make the TAS difficult to understand and maintain. Without the architect's guidance, future modifications may be inconsistent or error-prone, especially in a…
Question
You have inherited a TAS that is working well. It uses keyword-driven scripting and was well architected. The automation architect who built the system has now moved on to another company. The TAS is working across several projects and has a multiple library of keywords, categorized by project. The individual project teams maintain these keyword scripts. Based only on the given information, what is the MOST significant risk for the TAS?
Options
- AThe keyword driven scripts may become out of date if not maintained.
- BThe level of abstraction, coupled with the departure of the architect may make the system hard to
- CNew projects may not work as well with the TAS as the current projects.
- DBecause the keyword scripts are maintained by different teams, there is a likelihood that good
How the community answered
(59 responses)- A10% (6)
- B58% (34)
- C7% (4)
- D25% (15)
Explanation
The most significant risk is that the level of abstraction, combined with the departure of the original architect, could make the TAS difficult to understand and maintain. Without the architect's guidance, future modifications may be inconsistent or error-prone, especially in a system that relies heavily on structured architecture and abstraction.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.