CISSP · Question #1473
What is the purpose of an Internet Protocol (IP) spoofing attack?
The correct answer is D. To convince a system that it is communicating with a known entity. IP spoofing involves forging the source IP address in packets to impersonate a trusted host, deceiving the target system into believing it is communicating with a known, legitimate entity.
Question
What is the purpose of an Internet Protocol (IP) spoofing attack?
Options
- ATo send excessive amounts of data to a process, making it unpredictable
- BTo intercept network traffic without authorization
- CTo disguise the destination address from a target's IP filtering devices
- DTo convince a system that it is communicating with a known entity
How the community answered
(65 responses)- A3% (2)
- B2% (1)
- C5% (3)
- D91% (59)
Why each option
IP spoofing involves forging the source IP address in packets to impersonate a trusted host, deceiving the target system into believing it is communicating with a known, legitimate entity.
Sending excessive data to overwhelm a process describes a buffer overflow attack, not IP spoofing.
Intercepting network traffic without authorization describes a packet sniffing or man-in-the-middle attack, which is a passive or interception-based technique rather than address forgery.
IP spoofing falsifies the source address, not the destination address; disguising the destination address does not accurately describe the mechanism or goal of IP spoofing.
IP spoofing works by falsifying the source IP address in packet headers so the receiving system believes the traffic originates from a trusted or known host. This deception is the core purpose of the attack, enabling the attacker to bypass trust-based authentication, hijack sessions, or facilitate other attacks like reflected DDoS by exploiting the target's belief in the sender's identity.
Concept tested: IP spoofing attack purpose and mechanism
Source: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/news/understanding-denial-service-attacks
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.