"Third party doctrine" as it relates to the fourth amendment of the US constitution concerns:

The correct answer is C. Data or information a suspect shares with a third party is not privacy protected. The Supreme Court has confirmed that information placed in the hands of a 搕hird party?is not protected by the Fourth Amendment. For example, no warrant is required to request a list of called persons. This third-party doctrine means that companies may provide data from…

Government and Court Access to Private-Sector Information

Question

Options

AThree authorities are required for creating and administering a warrant.
BSomeone referring to themselves in the third person is hiding something.
CData or information a suspect shares with a third party is not privacy protected.
DA third party can wiretap a suspect without a warrant and then give the data to the police.

How the community answered

(21 responses)

A
5% (1)
B
5% (1)
C
81% (17)
D
10% (2)

Explanation

The Supreme Court has confirmed that information placed in the hands of a 搕hird party?is not protected by the Fourth Amendment. For example, no warrant is required to request a list of called persons. This third-party doctrine means that companies may provide data from employees or customers to the government.

Topics

#third party doctrine#Fourth Amendment#constitutional privacy#warrant requirement

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full CIPP-US Practice