Which of the following is the PRIMARY reason that regulatory authorities would require permission for corporate use of drones with mounted video cameras for visual surveillance?

The correct answer is D. To provide sufficient notice to the public. Regulators require prior permission for drone surveillance primarily to ensure the public receives adequate notice that they may be recorded. Privacy law is grounded in the principle of notice and consent - individuals have a right to know when they are being monitored. Granting

Privacy Governance

Question

Options

ATo prevent compromise of network security
BTo minimize disruption in wireless networks
CTo facilitate investigation of privacy incidents
DTo provide sufficient notice to the public

How the community answered

(53 responses)

A
2% (1)
B
4% (2)
C
2% (1)
D
92% (49)

Explanation

Regulators require prior permission for drone surveillance primarily to ensure the public receives adequate notice that they may be recorded. Privacy law is grounded in the principle of notice and consent - individuals have a right to know when they are being monitored. Granting permission allows authorities to enforce disclosure requirements and protect civil liberties. Network security (A) and wireless disruption (B) are technical concerns unrelated to privacy regulation. Facilitating investigations (C) is a secondary benefit, not the primary driver for requiring permission.

Topics

#Privacy notice#Visual surveillance#Regulatory compliance#Transparency

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full CDPSE Practice