nerdexam
CompTIA

CAS-002 · Question #630

A breach at a government agency resulted in the public release of top secret information. The Chief Information Security Officer has tasked a group of security professionals to deploy a system which…

The correct answer is C. A MAC which enforces no read-up, a MAC which enforces no write-down, and a DAC which. Preventing government data leakage requires MAC enforcing the Bell-LaPadula properties: no read-up prevents access to higher-classified data, and no write-down prevents copying data to lower classification levels.

Enterprise Security

Question

A breach at a government agency resulted in the public release of top secret information. The Chief Information Security Officer has tasked a group of security professionals to deploy a system which will protect against such breaches in the future. Which of the following can the government agency deploy to meet future security needs?

Options

  • AA DAC which enforces no read-up, a DAC which enforces no write-down, and a MAC which
  • BA MAC which enforces no write-up, a MAC which enforces no read-down, and a DAC which
  • CA MAC which enforces no read-up, a MAC which enforces no write-down, and a DAC which
  • DA DAC which enforces no write-up, a DAC which enforces no read-down, and a MAC which

How the community answered

(50 responses)
  • A
    24% (12)
  • B
    6% (3)
  • C
    56% (28)
  • D
    14% (7)

Why each option

Preventing government data leakage requires MAC enforcing the Bell-LaPadula properties: no read-up prevents access to higher-classified data, and no write-down prevents copying data to lower classification levels.

AA DAC which enforces no read-up, a DAC which enforces no write-down, and a MAC which

DAC is user-managed and cannot reliably enforce no read-up or no write-down because individual data owners can override permissions, making it unsuitable as the primary control for mandatory classification boundaries.

BA MAC which enforces no write-up, a MAC which enforces no read-down, and a DAC which

No write-up and no read-down are the Biba integrity model properties, not the Bell-LaPadula confidentiality properties needed to prevent top-secret data from leaking to lower classification levels.

CA MAC which enforces no read-up, a MAC which enforces no write-down, and a DAC whichCorrect

MAC enforcing no read-up (the Simple Security Property) prevents subjects from reading data classified above their clearance level, while MAC enforcing no write-down (the Star Property) prevents subjects from copying top-secret data into lower-classified storage. These two rules together form the Bell-LaPadula model, the standard mandatory access control model designed specifically to preserve confidentiality in government classified environments. DAC is then used for discretionary access decisions within those mandatory boundaries.

DA DAC which enforces no write-up, a DAC which enforces no read-down, and a MAC which

DAC enforcing classification boundaries is insufficient because it allows the data owner to grant read or write permissions at their discretion, which is incompatible with mandatory government classification requirements.

Concept tested: Bell-LaPadula MAC model for classified data protection

Source: https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-53/rev-5/final

Topics

#MAC#DAC#Bell-LaPadula model#mandatory access control

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full CAS-002 Practice