CAS-002 · Question #124
A morphed worm carrying a 0-day payload has infiltrated the company network and is now spreading across the organization. The security administrator was able to isolate the worm communication and…
The correct answer is A. Deploy the following ACL to the HIPS: DENY-TCP-ANY-ANY-445. Deploying a deny ACL on the HIPS blocks TCP 445 at the host level, stopping the worm from spreading laterally inside the network where the perimeter firewall has no visibility.
Question
A morphed worm carrying a 0-day payload has infiltrated the company network and is now spreading across the organization. The security administrator was able to isolate the worm communication and payload distribution channel to TCP port 445. Which of the following can the administrator do in the short term to minimize the attack?
Options
- ADeploy the following ACL to the HIPS: DENY-TCP-ANY-ANY-445.
- BRun a TCP 445 port scan across the organization and patch hosts with open ports.
- CAdd the following ACL to the corporate firewall: DENY-TCP-ANY-ANY-445.
- DForce a signature update and full system scan from the enterprise anti-virus solution.
How the community answered
(61 responses)- A85% (52)
- B8% (5)
- C5% (3)
- D2% (1)
Why each option
Deploying a deny ACL on the HIPS blocks TCP 445 at the host level, stopping the worm from spreading laterally inside the network where the perimeter firewall has no visibility.
Because the worm is already inside the network, a perimeter firewall rule cannot stop its lateral spread - deploying DENY-TCP-ANY-ANY-445 to the Host-based IPS applies the block directly on each individual endpoint, preventing the worm from leveraging the SMB protocol on TCP 445 to replicate from host to host within the internal network.
Scanning and patching hosts is a valid remediation step but is far too slow during an active, spreading infection and would not contain the worm while the patching process is underway.
A corporate firewall ACL blocks traffic at the network perimeter but cannot prevent the worm from spreading laterally between hosts that are already inside the internal network.
A 0-day payload has no existing antivirus signatures, so forcing a signature update would not detect or remove the worm and provides no effective short-term containment.
Concept tested: Host-based IPS ACL for lateral worm containment
Source: https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-94/final
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.