nerdexam
CompTIA

CAS-001 · Question #499

Three companies want to allow their employees to seamlessly connect to each other's wireless corporate networks while keeping one consistent wireless client configuration. Each company wants to…

The correct answer is A. The three companies should agree on a single SSID and configure a hierarchical RADIUS system. This question tests how to architect inter-organizational wireless authentication so each company authenticates its own users via 802.1x while maintaining a single client configuration across all three networks.

Technical Integration of Enterprise Components

Question

Three companies want to allow their employees to seamlessly connect to each other's wireless corporate networks while keeping one consistent wireless client configuration. Each company wants to maintain its own authentication infrastructure and wants to ensure that an employee who is visiting the other two companies is authenticated by the home office when connecting to the other companies' wireless network. All three companies have agreed to standardize on 802.1x EAP-PEAP-MSCHAPv2 for client configuration. Which of the following should the three companies implement?

Options

  • AThe three companies should agree on a single SSID and configure a hierarchical RADIUS system
  • BThe three companies should implement federated authentication through Shibboleth connected to
  • CThe three companies should implement a central portal-based single sign-on and agree to use
  • DAll three companies should use the same wireless vendor to facilitate the use of a shared cloud

How the community answered

(29 responses)
  • A
    52% (15)
  • B
    14% (4)
  • C
    7% (2)
  • D
    28% (8)

Why each option

This question tests how to architect inter-organizational wireless authentication so each company authenticates its own users via 802.1x while maintaining a single client configuration across all three networks.

AThe three companies should agree on a single SSID and configure a hierarchical RADIUS systemCorrect

A hierarchical RADIUS system enables each company to operate its own RADIUS server while using RADIUS proxy chaining to forward authentication requests to the user's home organization. When a visiting employee connects, the local RADIUS server proxies the EAP-PEAP-MSCHAPv2 authentication request to the employee's home RADIUS server, which validates the credentials against its own directory and returns the result. This preserves each company's independent authentication infrastructure, supports 802.1x natively, and requires only a single shared SSID and client configuration.

BThe three companies should implement federated authentication through Shibboleth connected to

Shibboleth is a SAML 2.0 web-based identity federation system and is fundamentally incompatible with 802.1x EAP-PEAP-MSCHAPv2, which requires a RADIUS-based authentication path, not browser-based SAML assertions.

CThe three companies should implement a central portal-based single sign-on and agree to use

A central portal-based SSO solution relies on HTTP browser redirects for authentication and cannot integrate with 802.1x supplicant-level authentication as required by EAP-PEAP-MSCHAPv2.

DAll three companies should use the same wireless vendor to facilitate the use of a shared cloud

Using a shared cloud wireless controller from the same vendor centralizes infrastructure management but does not provide a mechanism for each company to independently authenticate its own users via its own directory.

Concept tested: Federated 802.1x wireless authentication using hierarchical RADIUS proxy

Source: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2865

Topics

#802.1x#RADIUS federation#EAP-PEAP#wireless authentication

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full CAS-001 Practice