Which of the following incompatibility types can you use in the Automatic and Manual Planning incompatibility area? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Question

Options

• AVehicle resource - Location (stay level)
• BTransportation request header - Transportation request header
• CFreight unit - Freight booking
• DCarrier - Transportation order

• A
  71% (17)
• B
  21% (5)
• D
  8% (2)

Explanation

In SAP Transportation Management (SAP TM), the Automatic and Manual Planning incompatibility area supports specific incompatibility types that govern which freight units and vehicle resources can be combined during planning runs. Vehicle resource - Location (stay level) (A) is valid here because it prevents a vehicle from stopping at certain locations during planning, ensuring route-level constraints are respected. Freight unit - Freight booking (C) is also valid because it controls which freight units cannot be loaded onto specific freight bookings, directly impacting transportation planning decisions.

Option B (Transportation request header - Transportation request header) belongs to the Freight Unit Building incompatibility area, where it prevents incompatible transportation request headers from being consolidated into the same freight unit - not a planning-stage concern. Option D (Carrier - Transportation order) applies to the Carrier Selection incompatibility area, restricting certain carriers from being assigned to specific transportation orders, which is a separate step after planning.

Memory tip: Think of the Automatic and Manual Planning area as dealing with the physical movement of goods - it concerns what goes where (Freight unit ↔ Booking) and what goes through where (Vehicle ↔ Location). If an incompatibility type involves order creation or carrier assignment, it belongs to a different area.

No community discussion yet for this question.