For a picking task, the system must determine the storage types from which to remove the stock. How does the system find the storage type search sequence?

Question

Options

• AThe system attempts to read a completely qualified entry, with all parameters and indicators, then
• BThe system attempts to read the combination of warehouse number and stock removal indicator,
• CThe system attempts to use the defined access strategy, then it uses the combination of
• DThe system attempts to read the combination of warehouse number, stock removal indicator, stock

• A
  3% (1)
• B
  3% (1)
• C
  12% (4)
• D
  82% (28)

Explanation

Option D correctly describes the full parameter combination SAP Warehouse Management uses when searching for the storage type search sequence during stock removal. The system applies a most-specific-to-least-specific access strategy, starting with the combination of warehouse number, stock removal indicator, and stock category (plus any additional qualifiers), then progressively dropping parameters until it finds a matching entry in the control table - ensuring the most precise configuration is always applied first.

Why the distractors are wrong:

• A is partially correct in concept (reading a fully qualified entry first) but omits the specific parameters the system actually uses, making it incomplete.
• B is too narrow - using only warehouse number and stock removal indicator skips key parameters like stock category that differentiate search sequences.
• C describes the logic vaguely ("defined access strategy") without correctly naming the parameter combination, making it an imprecise distractor that sounds plausible but lacks specificity.

Memory tip: Think of it as a "funnel" - the system starts with the widest net (all parameters: warehouse number + stock removal indicator + stock category + more), then narrows by dropping qualifiers one by one until it finds a hit. "D = Detailed parameters first" can help you recall that the correct answer involves the most complete parameter combination.

No community discussion yet for this question.