Which of the following can you do with Automated Invoice Settlement (2LH)? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Question

Options

• APost the appropriate invoices yourself while using evaluated receipt settlement.
• BSettle the created goods movements without receipt of an invoice.
• CSchedule a job that will periodically settle invoices.
• DUse the evaluated receipt settlement without the supplier's approval.

• A
  75% (30)
• B
  8% (3)
• D
  18% (7)

Explanation

A and C are correct because Automated Invoice Settlement (2LH) in SAP MM serves two key purposes: it allows you to manually post invoices yourself within an ERS workflow (A), and it supports scheduling background jobs to periodically and automatically settle invoices (C) - making it a flexible tool for both manual intervention and full automation.

B is wrong because settling goods movements without an invoice is the specific purpose of Evaluated Receipt Settlement (ERS) itself, not a distinct capability of 2LH - 2LH is the transaction that runs ERS, not a separate invoice-free settlement method.

D is wrong because ERS always requires the supplier's explicit agreement, which is configured in the vendor master data - skipping that approval is not permitted regardless of which transaction you use.

Memory tip: Think of 2LH as your "settlement control panel" - it lets you Post manually (A) and Schedule automatically (C). The key phrase is "Automated Invoice Settlement," which implies jobs running on a schedule, not eliminating the invoice process entirely (ruling out B) or bypassing supplier agreements (ruling out D).

No community discussion yet for this question.