C_CPE_2409 · Question #9
In which type of system environments do the side-by-side extensions typically run? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.
The correct answer is A. Distributed B. Autonomous. Side-by-side extensions are designed to run outside the core system they extend, which is why they operate in Distributed (A) environments - the extension lives in a separate system (such as SAP BTP) that communicates with the core via APIs. They are also Autonomous (B) because…
Question
In which type of system environments do the side-by-side extensions typically run? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.
Options
- ADistributed
- BAutonomous
- CCentralized
- DHeterogenic
How the community answered
(61 responses)- A93% (57)
- C5% (3)
- D2% (1)
Explanation
Side-by-side extensions are designed to run outside the core system they extend, which is why they operate in Distributed (A) environments - the extension lives in a separate system (such as SAP BTP) that communicates with the core via APIs. They are also Autonomous (B) because they function independently, with their own lifecycle, deployment, and scaling, decoupled from the host system's release cycles. Centralized (C) is incorrect because that model embeds everything into a single system - the opposite of the side-by-side pattern. Heterogenic (D) describes environments with mixed, dissimilar components, which is a characteristic of infrastructure variety, not a defining trait of where side-by-side extensions run.
Memory tip: Think of "side-by-side" literally - the extension stands beside the core (Distributed) and can stand on its own (Autonomous). Both words rhyme with independence.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.